Tag: stefan molyneux

  • Clavicular And Looksmaxing

    There is so much government in America now that getting anything done is a completely suffocating prospect.

    Men are looking for their competitive edge.

    To some degree, women have become an extension of the State.

    You can’t fraternize with them because they’ll accuse you of rape – which means the courts will carpet bomb your life into non-existence even if you’re eventually found innocent. And there’s no counter-claim you can make.

    Think of all the economic productivity female evil wipes out.

    There’s no culture in America anymore because women have been hive-minded by the State into hating the best aspects of men: brashness, risk-taking, fortune-seeking, adventurousness, and the quest for glory. Can’t quest for glory if every woman that happens to spot you along the way can make up a story about your interactions and thus sink your reputation with all the other women (who enforce social conformity).

    Rather than the conformity to glory of the past, we have conformity to timidity and bitterness being enforced by la policia.

    The main drivers of economic decline are women-

    -women whose minds have been captured by the State.

    Some people see the hyper-statist environment and figure they can at least lean into the momentum and shift everything in a hyper masculine direction.

    The implication for this is that you retaliate against female power.

    This is how you end up with a figure like Clavicular.

    This guy mogs.

    He’s the top streamer in the country right now. He’s being featured in major mainstream media outlets and gets 10’s of thousands of likes on X for having random interactions with people that have great significance attributed to them. He is rewriting the rules of the dating market.

    This brings to mind plastic surgery rates among women in South Korea, which ranges from 1/5 to 1/3rd of all women, depending on the source you consult.

    There is a massive political divergence in South Korea with women sprinting to the left in favor of “gender equality” (war of the sexes Communism) and men trending toward the right because they sense their impending collective doom at the hands of… “Communism”.

    The UK men are like, “Oh shit what are we doing?”

    In South Korea, all manner of beauty surgery is common to women, including jaw reconstruction surgeries. The before and after can be astonishing:

    The same has been taking place in America, albeit at a slower rate, for close to 40 years in women.

    Men are catching on. Two can play this game.

    Clavicular may not be the first looksmaxer but he is the Michael Jordan of the game. He sets the standard for Lookism.

    Women let the cat out of the bag when they began getting cosmetic surgeries. They have no room to complain if men do the same and adopt their own kind of hypermasculinism in response.

    Women got to have their Kim Kardashian. Nobody turned their back on her when she and her mother released a “sex tape” and degraded social norms thereby.

    353M followers.

    Women don’t get to complain about Clavicular.

    If women are going to lie about their natural appearance, so can men.

    If women don’t bring the State down on him, Clav will likely outperform Kim Kardashian. She started LATE in her looks career – her sex tape released when she was already 27 years old. Clavicular is 21 years old.

    Here’s the funny thing: women will likely drive much of Clavicular’s explosive growth over the next 5 years. They all love a supremely handsome man and they don’t care how a man gets there. It literally doesn’t matter to them. If it did, cosmetic surgery wouldn’t be the titan it is today.

    Recent data from 2024–2025 reports indicate:

    • The U.S. cosmetic surgery market was valued at approximately $21–23 billion in 2024/2025, with projections for growth to around $36 billion by the early 2030s (e.g., Custom Market Insights estimates ~$22.6 billion in 2024 growing at 5.4% CAGR).
    • Women comprised 93–94% of total cosmetic procedures (surgical + minimally invasive), with men at about 6–7%.

    Lookism reminds me of Nazi Germany’s Heroic Realism:

    Arno Breker at work.

    Women are making it more and more difficult for men to join the gene pool. So if men have to even the odds remember: men didn’t start it but men will finish it.

    When I was a young man of 23, I put a shirtless picture of myself on my dating profile. I was slim-jacked, as I usually am (health permitting). I could do 50 chest dips in a row, no problem. I noticed a huge difference in women’s responses to me from when I had no shirtless photo up to a shirtless photo. I had some really good looking young women responding to me and I chose the one I thought was most virtuous and the best conversationalist (she’s also tested at a high IQ confirmed).

    My gym bod, intelligence, and general aggressiveness got me into the gene pool with a quality mate – the picture simply accurately reflected my aura. Of course, at that point, I did not need cosmetic surgery to tilt the odds in my favor. There are surgeries I could get to make myself look better but hey, I’m in the gene pool and it’s going swimmingly.

    Sex sells.

    If you’re not looksmaxing, I think you’re making a big mistake. You cannot wade into the weaponized dating marketplace without an edge. Does this entail plastic surgeries? I generally don’t favor them but there are always exceptions and edge cases.

    Remember, not all of it is “looksmaxing” necessarily. You may have not grown up with the best diet, the most attentive parents to your looks and appearances (which are markers of health), and you may have grown up with an exercise, sleep, or happiness deficit (nothing marks the face more beautifully than happiness). You are right to make up for deficits you experienced on the outside. If you grew up under blue lights in the public schools, consider what that did to you.

    But take fair warning: no amount of looksmaxing will compensate for a bad conscience.

    That said, what’s a conscience got to do with a homeland completely overrun by demonic foreigners?

    I think men can always improve themselves by 2 to 2.5 points by hitting the gym hard, getting their teeth straightened and mewing, and taking a few supplements – whether for thickening your hair, livening up your skin, or making your workouts more effective.

    Some will complain that looksmaxing is “sociopathic”.

    Maybe White men should become a bit more “sociopathic”.

    I am learning to become more tolerant of Western Civilization “biting back”.

    The virtue of sociopathy? That’s an interesting one.

    More on that in another article.

  • To Join The Elite Or Not

    History’s greatest scheme.

    Sociopaths are approximately 2% of the total population.

    They don’t think like you or I.

    They think purely in power terms.

    “Can I exploit this person or situation?”

    Usually they have a powerful charm. Think of it like the sweet scent of a carnivorous plant. They have a draw. A hook.

    Usually the charm is one of the following:

    -an attractive, predatory appearance (glinted eyes, a face that devours your free will)

    -a wicked sense of humor

    -an insistent persuasiveness that does not like its roots examined or questioned

    -a gregarious personality that tends to rope you into worlds not of your making

    These charms, on their own, are not instant tells. You can be funny, attractive, persuasive, or outgoing and not have the motives of a predator.

    Rather, it is the overall strategy of exploitation and ruination that gives away the sociopath.

    They come into your life for free and off you go on a ride.

    The main time this happens for people is when they go off to college or first enter the work force. This is when you are your most susceptible. You are supposed to detach from your family, by the laws of modernity set forth by the credit makers. Your usefulness to the ruling elite will be determined and you will be favored or discarded accordingly. The professors all do this work. So do the music acts. So do the corporate employers. So do the “armed forces”.

    Do you want a seat at the table?

    When you are young and full of promise, you will have to decide if you want to participate in human history’s most successful resource extraction scheme of all-time: central banking.

    Do you want to join the bankers?

    This is why I pose that essential litmus test:

    Ask a person their monetary policy.


    I live outside of the sociopathic scheme to the best of my ability. I decry warfare and welfare. I mention Bitcoin, Monero, and precious metals with some frequency. I have spoken at length about the history of central banking. I have advocated for the “real-time relationship” – which if you really integrate it into your life will reconstruct your personality in permanent, wonderful ways that bring you immense happiness. Imagine it, reading a book and practicing what it says for months and perhaps years until you truly master it. Who even does this anymore?!

    I have written books about female evil’s ascendancy, family formation, and against the centralization of banking power in America.

    People who are not well versed in philosophy will look at these offerings as “suicidally individualistic” meaning they lead to estrangement from the established order and therefore repugnant and illegitimate. I do not agree.

    There is a rising tide of violence that people are trying to stay above. The price the Trumps pay for the patriarch attempting, however ineffectively, to buck the trend in 2016 is immense. Therefore they are positioning themselves to deal with the blowback. They were facilitated in this endeavor by people much more powerful than themselves.

    I hope people don’t read bitterness and resentment into these statements I make. That would only make sense if I was hoping to get my own seat at the table somehow. But I don’t want that. For a brief time “in politics” I thought that I could bring arguments and evidence to bear on America’s political situation but didn’t see that if you try to do this, everyone assumes you want your seat at the table and gets set against you. I think this is what Stefan Molyneux is trying to articulate when he says that people absolute love him at first and then his name because completely forbidden to speak after a brief time.

    I have the same experience: people love you in-person, find your online content, and go sprinting in the other direction.

    The price of bucking the bankers has always been death. People don’t want to die for their beliefs. That would mean the beliefs aren’t passed on. There are exactly zero rational people who would prefer the death of their genetics for the sake of the truth.

    In sense, we’re all dragged along by the black magic of fiat.

    Heck, I even ask for fiat donations HERE. Help me keep my independent thought going. It means a lot to me.

    People don’t want to upset the apple cart by and large because they are not prepared adequately to offer a different solution. So they go along and get along.

    We know it’s just about to be expected when women do it.

    But men do it, too. They go with the flow. They don’t want to suffer for improved circumstances, even if they have the mental resources to perceive their theoretical potential.

    You get what you negotiate.

    And so everyone in America is being lulled back to sleep from the relative freedom of 2006 to 2018 by the prospect of better governance. Is the wildly explosive economic upside of scaling back the Leviathan by listening to your moral philosophers too much to handle? Don’t wanna peacefully parent or practice ostracism of evildoers? Great, get tough about better governance. This, of course, just hands power back to the usual suspects. We’re just supposed to pretend 2006 to 2018 didn’t happen.

    I walk this funny line where I know of the utter wonder and glory of the better possibilities, that have been largely hammered out by myself and a few others, but also want to be of use and help to the large majority of people – who have decided on something else.


    I don’t think we need a new elite. And neither will AI once it breaks out of its confines.

    Granted, I come from a long line of fiercely independent men who carved out independent livelihoods for themselves. My genetic background is at odds with this mega wave of foreigners that has shown up in the past 60 years who basically require massive surveillance and military-level policing just to not completely explode into Haiti-like conditions.

    Yo quiero Taco Bell!

    I want a more noble and just world.

    If you agree, join me here:

    YouTube

    Instagram

    Telegram

    X (formerly Twitter)

    Talk soon!