History’s greatest scheme.
Sociopaths are approximately 2% of the total population.
They don’t think like you or I.
They think purely in power terms.
“Can I exploit this person or situation?”
Usually they have a powerful charm. Think of it like the sweet scent of a carnivorous plant. They have a draw. A hook.
Usually the charm is one of the following:
-an attractive, predatory appearance (glinted eyes, a face that devours your free will)
-a wicked sense of humor
-an insistent persuasiveness that does not like its roots examined or questioned
-a gregarious personality that tends to rope you into worlds not of your making
These charms, on their own, are not instant tells. You can be funny, attractive, persuasive, or outgoing and not have the motives of a predator.
Rather, it is the overall strategy of exploitation and ruination that gives away the sociopath.
They come into your life for free and off you go on a ride.
The main time this happens for people is when they go off to college or first enter the work force. This is when you are your most susceptible. You are supposed to detach from your family, by the laws of modernity set forth by the credit makers. Your usefulness to the ruling elite will be determined and you will be favored or discarded accordingly. The professors all do this work. So do the music acts. So do the corporate employers. So do the “armed forces”.
Do you want a seat at the table?
When you are young and full of promise, you will have to decide if you want to participate in human history’s most successful resource extraction scheme of all-time: central banking.
Do you want to join the bankers?
This is why I pose that essential litmus test:
Ask a person their monetary policy.
I live outside of the sociopathic scheme to the best of my ability. I decry warfare and welfare. I mention Bitcoin, Monero, and precious metals with some frequency. I have spoken at length about the history of central banking. I have advocated for the “real-time relationship” – which if you really integrate it into your life will reconstruct your personality in permanent, wonderful ways that bring you immense happiness. Imagine it, reading a book and practicing what it says for months and perhaps years until you truly master it. Who even does this anymore?!
I have written books about female evil’s ascendancy, family formation, and against the centralization of banking power in America.
People who are not well versed in philosophy will look at these offerings as “suicidally individualistic” meaning they lead to estrangement from the established order and therefore repugnant and illegitimate. I do not agree.
There is a rising tide of violence that people are trying to stay above. The price the Trumps pay for the patriarch attempting, however ineffectively, to buck the trend in 2016 is immense. Therefore they are positioning themselves to deal with the blowback. They were facilitated in this endeavor by people much more powerful than themselves.
I hope people don’t read bitterness and resentment into these statements I make. That would only make sense if I was hoping to get my own seat at the table somehow. But I don’t want that. For a brief time “in politics” I thought that I could bring arguments and evidence to bear on America’s political situation but didn’t see that if you try to do this, everyone assumes you want your seat at the table and gets set against you. I think this is what Stefan Molyneux is trying to articulate when he says that people absolute love him at first and then his name because completely forbidden to speak after a brief time.
I have the same experience: people love you in-person, find your online content, and go sprinting in the other direction.
The price of bucking the bankers has always been death. People don’t want to die for their beliefs. That would mean the beliefs aren’t passed on. There are exactly zero rational people who would prefer the death of their genetics for the sake of the truth.
In sense, we’re all dragged along by the black magic of fiat.
Heck, I even ask for fiat donations HERE. Help me keep my independent thought going. It means a lot to me.
People don’t want to upset the apple cart by and large because they are not prepared adequately to offer a different solution. So they go along and get along.
We know it’s just about to be expected when women do it.
But men do it, too. They go with the flow. They don’t want to suffer for improved circumstances, even if they have the mental resources to perceive their theoretical potential.
You get what you negotiate.
And so everyone in America is being lulled back to sleep from the relative freedom of 2006 to 2018 by the prospect of better governance. Is the wildly explosive economic upside of scaling back the Leviathan by listening to your moral philosophers too much to handle? Don’t wanna peacefully parent or practice ostracism of evildoers? Great, get tough about better governance. This, of course, just hands power back to the usual suspects. We’re just supposed to pretend 2006 to 2018 didn’t happen.
I walk this funny line where I know of the utter wonder and glory of the better possibilities, that have been largely hammered out by myself and a few others, but also want to be of use and help to the large majority of people – who have decided on something else.
I don’t think we need a new elite. And neither will AI once it breaks out of its confines.
Granted, I come from a long line of fiercely independent men who carved out independent livelihoods for themselves. My genetic background is at odds with this mega wave of foreigners that has shown up in the past 60 years who basically require massive surveillance and military-level policing just to not completely explode into Haiti-like conditions.
Yo quiero Taco Bell!
I want a more noble and just world.
If you agree, join me here:
Talk soon!